|
||
|
Editorial Calendar
Media Planner Reprints Issue/Article Orders Issue Index Current Advertisers Contact |
Investing WorldwideIncreasing globalization leads corporate America to examine options overseas. By Debra Stracke Anderson, CCIM, and J. Patrick Moultrup Commercial real estate professionals who do most of their business in the U.S. often focus on the local rather than the international picture. Yet in today's fast-globalizing economy, that may be a short-sighted stance to take. In the last 10 years, the world has become a much smaller place and U.S. real estate markets already are affected. For example, consider how the increase in volume of Asian imports is changing the U.S. warehouse and distribution industry. By the same token, corporate America's acceptance of outsourcing is sending U.S. real estate executives to such markets as China and India to oversee development, acquisition, and leasing of space for U.S. companies. Sooner rather than later, more globalization factors are going to affect local real estate markets. Those who are aware of where we are headed are better able to act, rather than respond, to these events. The Corporate Revolution This new paradigm even affects the course of emerging businesses. For example, a recent venture capital conference in Silicon Valley revealed that today's venture capitalists are far more critical of new business offerings than in the past. A primary consideration for funding a new company is assurance that the business model demonstrates a global deployment of staff and resources. The 20/80 rule dictates that new firms invest only 20 percent of the funds in the U.S. and 80 percent internationally. The logic is simple. Venture capitalists have seen that resources in markets such as India and China are less expensive, readily available, and operate largely on a 24/7 work ethic. By taking full advantage of these resources, companies are leveraging the venture capitalist's investment fully, translating to a greater return with a more balanced business plan.
But corporate America has found that managing a global team requires adaptability, which can be challenging. Most companies manage existing business activities well, but find it much more difficult to incorporate long-term changes into their global business plans and operations. Deeply ingrained in the heart of most organizations are three basic barriers to adaptability: • management team inflexibility; • increased organizational complexity; and • poor alignment between current resources and future opportunities. Overcoming these barriers to adaptability requires a
rethinking of an organization's "social architecture" - the bringing
together of individual behavior, structure, and culture, which determines a
company's long-term performance. Approaching Global Expansion Corporate real estate service providers are helping companies meet this challenge by replicating their traditional line of integrated services - brokerage, consulting, transactional, and lease management - on a global scale. Often that requires partnering with local resources and ultimately committing more resources to offshore markets, possibly at the expense of U.S markets. Whether the 20/80 rule will apply to multinational real estate companies remains to be seen, but clearly, if clients are moving to global markets, corporate service providers must move with them. While India and China currently attract the most attention from corporations, experience in these countries sets the stage for further exploration into other global markets, Southeast Asia and Latin America in particular. The Asian Attraction • lower-cost raw materials, components, and products; • supply chain improvements enabled by locating closer to customers who are increasingly building plants in Asia; • relatively inexpensive, educated, and seemingly unlimited labor: for example, direct labor in China runs at roughly one-tenth of U.S. cost; • access to growing consumer markets in the world's most populous countries; • low cost of capital and a myriad of tax incentives. While both India and China are recipients of U.S. corporate-funded growth, China has received more real estate development attention, primarily because of its potential for consumer growth. [For more information on India, see "India Calls," CIRE, Jan./Feb. 2006; www.ciremagazine.com/article.php?article_id=894] For example, China has 38 cities with more than 1 million people; the U.S. has nine. China's labor force is nearly 800 million people; the U.S. labor force is 147 million people. With such a clear demographic advantage, China has emerged as a major business, economic, and political force. U.S. direct investment in China includes manufacturing, hospitality and chain restaurant projects, and petrochemicals. U.S. companies have established "more than 20,000 equity joint ventures, contractual joint ventures, and wholly foreign-owned enterprises in China. More than 100 U.S.-based multinationals have projects in China. Cumulative U.S. investment in China is estimated at $54 billion, through the end of 2005, making the U.S. the second-largest foreign investor in China," according to the U.S. State Department. Potential technical breakthroughs to watch for in China include plant genetics, biosciences research, wireless applications, semiconductor device development, flat panel technology, automotives, and online games. These growing industries ensure that China's future in research and development is solid. The country's leadership shows a great deal of interest in intellectual property development. Recently appointed generals have all completed postgraduate studies, and all are firm believers in the application of technology. As technocrats, they do not believe China can become an economic power without proprietary technology, and they chafe at the idea of paying royalties on core technology and protocols.
Future Interests Ongoing challenges will continue to impact the current wave of global expansion, including changes in interest rates, oil prices, terrorist activities, and governmental trade restrictions. Still, the impact of globalization is too large to be ignored. photo caption: Monterrey, Mexico, was recognized by Fortune magazine as the "best city for business opportunities in Latin America."
|
Debra Stracke Anderson, CCIM, is president and chief executive officer of Sloan Street Advisors/ITRA in Vienna, Va. Contact her at (703) 758-7479 or debrasa@sloanstreetadvisors.com. J. Patrick Moultrup is president and chief executive officer of AsiaPac International in San Jose, Calif. Contact him at (408) 232-9700 or moultrup@asiapacintl.com.
CCIM International Initiatives Membership • CCIM Institute has more than 1,008 international members in 33 countries as of September 2006. • An estimated 300 students will earn the designation this year in Taiwan, China, Poland, Russia, and South Korea. • An estimated 500 new international members will enroll in the program this year. • CCIM Korea Chapter, the institute's second largest chapter, will hold a half-day conference. Education The institute will offer 35 courses in Warsaw, Poland; Beijing; Taipei, Taiwan; Moscow; St. Petersburg, Russia; and Mexico City. Trade Missions • EXPO Real and Study Tour, Munich, Germany • Four-city China tour with networking events Publications Working with the Institute of Real Estate Management and the Appraisal Institute, CCIM Institute will create a newsletter containing articles from member publications and make it available electronically in Chinese, Spanish, Korean, Russian, Polish, and Japanese.
|